The next phase in the evolution of action movies

Posted on by TheLastPsychiatrist and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

What does a boy get as a role model?

http://youtu.be/1zd4zGt13IE

The boy in the 80s is offered a fantasy role model: a lone hypermale fighting impossible odds.  His strength comes from muscles (Arnold) or insanity (Martin Riggs) or bravado (John Mclean) or rage (Rambo.)

That eventually fizzed out, and by the time the teens were in their mid to late twenties– out of reach of a sufficiently traumatic backstory that would propel them to grandiosity (Vietnam vet; family murdered; double crossed a decade ago) they were offered a temporary post-modern solution: you don’t have superpowers now, but if you needed them, when you needed them, you’d get them.  (The Matrix, etc.)

II.

Simultaneously, you had a surge  of superhot, hyperfemale action heroes.  You started to see it with The Fifth Element; La Femme Nikita spawned a remake and a TV show.  Lara Croft, Ultraviolet, Evolution, Charlie’s Angels, Wanted, Resident Evil, Barbed Wire– which inspired a whole lot of barbed wire tattoos.  On men.

All of this was a message to ourselves: we’ll never be brave heroes, but we could still be with such a hero.

These films tracked the generation raised on Arnold, and corresponded almost perfectly to the years of sexual discovery.  It was clear you would never be a covert agent, but as long as you were single there existed the possibility that you could have sex with a covert agent, and then you would yourself become a covert agent.

“So female action heroes wasn’t a sign of women’s gaining dominance or men’s emasculation?”  Ha! No, it was wishful thinking.

III.

And then the same men got…. married.  No more possibility of meeting a covert agent.

What’s left?

The next step in the life cycle was to have kids, and a really optimistic narcissist, still clinging to the fantasies, might say to himself: I am old and fat, and I’ve forgotten all my Russian.  And anyway, the Russians aren’t our enemies. I think.

What hope is there?  Your wife is older and heavier– or much, much thinner– and isn’t even motivated to talk about covert action, let alone be a covert agent.  She’s no Long Kiss Goodnight.

But the kids… they are limitless reservoirs of possibility.  Sure, they don’t know kung fu now, but they could learn.

At this point the only hope left to realize your fantasies is for your kid to become that fantasy, and then drag you along with them.

That’s a huge burden for a kid.  I’m sure it will turn out just fine.

IV.

But why is it always a daughter?  How come there’s no precocious boy action heroes?

First, take a look at your son: he’s an idiot.  Maybe he’s really smart but he’s as physical as a bag of water; or a super-spaz who can barely articulate a sentence.  The only thing he’s really, really good at is the left and right fire buttons.

But your daughter, at two, at four, at six, seems very sophisticated.  Sometimes she almost seems like an adult.  And she’s so pretty.

Never mind girls mature faster than men and the cards are stacked against girls anyway; your girls seems uniquely special, in a special way, and if there is anyone who could take advantage of an alternative universe where possibilities can be willed into reality, it would be the girl…..

So: Hanna.  So: Brave.  So:…

V.

What happened to the mom?

She’s dead.  Or something.  Her only function was to bear the child and provide some emotional force for your grandiosity.  Remember in the 80s how the family was killed?  Phew; they left the daughter alive.

Which is good, because you can’t run a winning Electra complex if it’s the boy you’re left with.

VI.

While this is all happening– while 40 year old men are being offered a last ditch-last ditch attempt at fantasy, the new cycle of kids are starting from the very beginning: marginal guy saves the girl: Harry Potter, Twilight, and about thirty or so comic book movies.  They run parallel to the middle-agers digital wish fulfillment, which reads: marginal guy is saved by his kid, redeemed by his kid, his partial object.

—-

The Action Movie Fairy Tale

More on Hanna
 

Related posts:

  1. The Death of the Last Action Hero
  2. Three Middle School Girls Assault Boy and Nothing Happens.
  3. Blinky Will Make Your Family Happy
  4. J.Crew Ad Tells Obsessive Moms that Obsessiveness is Okay
  5. Guess Who Dies in Green Lantern.

11 Responses to The next phase in the evolution of action movies

  1. Or says:

    This might be as good a time as any to bring this up: there is a surprising dearth of information online about the “partial objects” for which this site is named. There’s not even a Wikipedia page. How are we to free ourselves of the narcissism woven into the fabric of this world by Yaldabaoth if you keep all this stuff concealed within your psychoanalytic mystery cult? Can you point me in the direction of some accessible reading on the subject?

    • Comus says:

      Here.

      So a Kleinian would say it’s about breasts. Which it should be. But I think the idea is in a Lacan quote: “..not because these objects are part of a total object, the body, but because they represent only partially the function that produces them.”

    • Uninter says:

      What’s quite interesting is the portrayal of Big Daddy (Hit-Girl’s father) in the comic book (spoilers): He doesn’t have any great back story or an emotional, revenge driven plot… He was a boring, lonely, divorced man with a desk job, obsessed with comic books. He kidnapped his daughter while she was young and lived off the sale of his rare comic book collection which he kept with him at all times in a silver case, all the while he trained his daughter to be a killer – living vicariously through her as she acted out his superhero fantasy.

  2. gogo says:

    In Fringe and Tron there were sons with fathers which were out of reality when boys were childs. Fathers sarifices for sons and helps them get nice girl.

  3. cliche says:

    Twilight is not about the marginal guy, it’s about the marginal girl, who never ends up getting An Education.

  4. thecobrasnose says:

    Fascinating post, but I’ve got a question. You noted in a previous post that Hanna was made by foreigners, albeit for an American audience. Are the European filmmakers as immersed in the sensibility you described above, or do you think they’ve picked up on this insight into American culture?

  5. Pingback: Parents living vicariously through their children in Jiu-Jitsu!!?? :( - Page 4 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums

  6. gogo says:

    I just have seen Vertigo once more, and I finaly understand what was the movie about and also why A.H. thought that James Steward wasn´t fit the role. Thanks.

  7. Pingback: Týždeň - iný pohľad na spoločnosť » Mužov, ktorí nenávidia ženy, odhalí muž, ktorý súloží s Larou Croft.

Leave a Reply